![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
If a thing is worth doing, it's worth doing at the last minute. ___ O how I hate the sinful ways I love! ___ Things to do today: ___ "I always think I'm right, but I don't think I'm always right." ___ "You have been chosen, and you must therefore use such strength and heart and wits as you have." ___ "Oh, miracle -- thus to be able to give what we ourselves do not possess, sweet miracle of our empty hands!" ___ "This is not pleasant to you, Emma--and it is very far from pleasant to me; but I must, I will,--I will
tell you truths while I can; satisfied with proving myself your friend by very faithful counsel, and trusting that you will some time or other do me
greater justice than you can do now." ___ My writing is like Shakespeare's. At lease in the sense that I use many of the same words. ___ Tennis: what I lack in control, I make up for by over-hitting. |
These are the ARCHIVES of the OLD Presbyteer Blogsite.
Change your links to
I think something like that operates in theological discussions. I've been following a discussion about the nature of Reformed Theology, especially concerning the slogan "Semper Reformanda" ("Always Reforming"). Does that mean (1) that we are supposed to be making forward progress, or does it mean (2) that we should constantly be checking ourselves to make sure we never leave the fundamentals of the faith as articulated by the creeds and councils of the early church? If you set these two against each other, then I think you have to choose (2). But I don't think anyone really means to say (2) if it includes the claim that we have exhaustively and perfectly understood the doctrine of, say, justification. Does anyone really want to argue that the ultimate theological definition of justification was given at the Westminster Assembly in 1647, and that no one will ever have any more to add? And so I think that in this sense theology is like a long story and theologians are like writers and editors. A good writer throws away lots of stuff that he comes to regard as a waste of time because he has to admit that it just doesn't work in the story. And if he gets his story right, then the last chapter and the last line will be a perfect completion of the opening sentence and the first chapter. But he doesn't stop writing after the first chapter, just because he has a perfect opening. And the theologians don't quit thinking about things like justification or the Trinity just because the church has already said some true, necessary, and wonderful things about them. Keep working. Semper Reformanda. When you get to the perfect final line, well, then comes the end, right?
Other people are people, too. A great anecdote from Hutchens in the Mere Comments blog:
But that was all in the old days of DOS text screens and command prompts. Things have changed a lot since then. And now I have a couple of itches that really need a simple database scratch. My first thought is that there must be some simple Windows shareware / freeware database applications out there that let me define a couple of simple tables, a customizable data entry form, and even design a simple report or two. How complicated does that need to be? Well, so far it appears that you either get something that is so simple and single-minded that it's useless unless you're collecting the same kind of stamps as the guy who built it, or you get something that is so powerful and generalized that you soon are scratching your head wondering what few features among the thousands are the ones you really need. It feels like somewhere there must be a simple, medium-level product that thinks the way my poor obsolete brain thinks. And of course it must accommodate itself to my desire to spend no time actually reading any kind of manual or documentation. Three cheers for N. D. Wilson. He's the guy who has been in the news for showing how the shroud of Turin could have been produced with easily available techniques during the relic-crazy middle ages. He does not prove that the shroud is a forgery, but he does provide an answer to essentially every aspect of the thing that has puzzled modern analysts. Christianity Today has one of his articles online, Father Brown Fakes the Shroud. This is especially fun because Nathan is the son of Doug Wilson, the, er, colorful pastor of Christ Church in Moscow Idaho, whose Blog and Mablog I enjoy. He raised his many children with in-your-face home schooling and Christian schooling, and has been disparaged by many for the schools he and his church have helped establish. His son's brilliant work on the shroud question is a sweet kind of vindication for New Saint Andrews College, for example, which in the eyes of the critics, offers graduates about as much respect as is due people who send in for diplomas offered on Cracker Jack boxes.
Two excellent posts on Dying of Thirst in Mere Comments.
He is in a dorm-style barracks with a bassoonist roommate. Among other discoveries, they want to maintain their Physical Training regimen at a pretty high level and keep testing everyone at 4-week intervals. Houah.
Similar responses have been offered by others who were named in the MVP report:
The way the PCA at large treats the accusations and claims of the MVP report and the responses given by those named therein will say a lot about just what kind of gang we really are. Of course, if you aren't following the MVP kerfuffle and don't know from "Federal Vision", it's probably just as well.
I wonder if this is related to the odd comments about the agency of angels in the coming of the law.
These verses seem a little odd to us because when we read Exodus, we see Moses and Sinai and the tablets, but at the end of the story we don't come away ready to summarize the events by saying "the law came through angels." So I'm wondering if the writers say "the law came by angels" in order to emphasize this direct, new thing that God did, which had been promised before, but which was now come, and which required immediate and unmistakable revelation. Saying "the law came by angels" includes the fact that the angel of the Lord appeared to Moses in Exodus 3:2, and the angel of God led the way in Exodus 14:19, but it is not simply a description of the particular agency employed in the event. Even more, it is a way of emphasizing that this was a breakthrough event that God chose to accomplish among men by employing the very messengers of heaven. Well, this is a half-baked idea, and I'm not entirely comfortable with it yet. But I have the feeling that there is something to it.
Nine weeks of crawling, running, pushups, yessir's, and acquiring lethal skills do leave a certain mark. Sam seemed more serious, more confident, and in a way, quieter. He's now in the Virginia Beach area for an indeterminate period at the army music school. He has an idea that it will be at least 4 weeks; possibly 8; some spend several months. It varies with the soldier. But since Sam has had good marching and musical training, he doesn't expect it to take very long. Then perhaps some time at home in Nebraska before shipping to Japan. Along the way we had nice visits in Somerset KY, Nashville, and Saint Louis.
The dispensationalist reads this verse and sees the event as happening in the complex of events at the end of the world / Jesus' second coming. I used to follow that view. But now I find the amillennial / post-millennial readings much more satisfying.I think just about everyone agrees that Jesus is referring to Daniel 7:
The problem for the pre-millennial view is that in Daniel 7, Jesus "coming in clouds" is associated with his going *to* the Father, not returning to earth in his second coming. So the cosmic shake-up Jesus describes in Luke 21 refers not to the cataclysm at the end of time, but to the radical re-ordering of the cosmos when the Son ascends to the Father and receives all authority, there to sit until all the world is subdued for him (Psalm 110). These thoughts come to mind today as I read Stephen's speech in Acts 7.
And at that moment the Jews
threw Stephen out of the city and stoned him. The climax of
Stephen's offense, the thing the Jews could not bear to hear, was that
Jesus had fulfilled Daniel 7 in his ascension and was already at the right
hand of the Father.
I have re-named
Internet Explorer as "MS Virus Gate" on the desktop, and made
Firefox the default browser. That may help. Many viruses and
trojan horses are designed to exploit specific weaknesses in IE, since
it's the biggest target.
And as I rebooted and rescanned and rebooted, I got to read a good bit of one of Ralph Smith's books on
the Trinity (Paradox
and Truth) while babysitting the process. (Why is it so hard for
the world to admit that Cornelius Van Til was right? The Trinity is
the answer to the philosophical problem of the one and the many.
Maybe it's because CVT is so hard to read ...)
John 17:6-10 I have manifested your name to the people whom you gave me out of the world. Yours they were, and you gave them to me, and they have kept your word. [7] Now they know that everything that you have given me is from you. [8] For I have given them the words that you gave me, and they have received them and have come to know in truth that I came from you; and they have believed that you sent me. [9] I am praying for them. I am not praying for the world but for those whom you have given me, for they are yours. [10] All mine are yours, and yours are mine, and I am glorified in them. But the movie belonged to Al Pacino's Shylock. Just
perfect. I guess one thing that Shakespeare and the filmmakers do
agree on is the guilty Christian treatment of the Jews in Europe. These people must be found and sent somewhere nasty.
After
a couple of late nights, I
finished the Zion DVD project and delivered the master. (Who needs
sleep?) There are
pleasing aspects about the result, but I'm not completely satisfied.
Alas, too often you run out of time and just have to go with what you've
got. Time and schedule pressures as they were, I had to do the
voiceover narration myself. I had been hoping to get Morgan Freeman,
who does pretty good work. I still have a mind to do a Deluxe Edition that offers a
Director's Cut that is longer than the 10 minutes we have. At least
it would be nice to offer a Bonus Materials section for the slides I
didn't get to use. There were several good ones that got cut.
I'd like to group the unused pix by photographer, so you can see what
Rebecca, Lindsay, and Alyssa each contributed. I did find out how to make an MPEG for the web.
We'll probably post it on the Zion site. And this served as a good tune-up project for a more
general "Welcome to Zion" DVD for the brochure table. I
wonder if I'll be able to *finish* such a thing, not having a deadline. I
have been working like mad to meet a deadline for the DVD project for
Zion's capital campaign. For whatever reason, God knoweth, I am the
chairman of the video portion in the Print and Visual Committee. The
Print and Visual information packets are due to be assembled on Monday for
the teams to begin delivering them to the homes of the congregation.
Brochure, fact sheet, devotional guide, and a 10-minute DVD. Well,
the master DVD needs to be in the hands of the wonderful Dan Ehly tomorrow
so he can start cranking out 250 copies, which is not exactly like running
a copy machine. So tonight, before I close my eyes to sleep, one way
or the other, I will finish my part. This has been a
learning process. Now right there, that should tell you that there
were probably better choices out there than Ghormley. What we don't
need is a guy who is learning how to drive as he gives a mountain bus
tour. I have had some excellent pictures submitted by my
squad of volunteer camerades, and think I have them in a story sequence
that works. Matching the narration to the image stream is the real
trick, but after last night, I'm pretty well satisfied that I finally have
something that is right. Or at least right enough. I'm
using Roxio's Easy Media Creator 7, which came bundled with my hardware
DVD-R drive. (I purposely bought the Plextor brand just for the
Roxio software suite, which looked like the best deal.) Roxio's DVD
Builder module does most of what it feels like I need to do. You can
put in any number of slides, manage how long each slide displays, add pan
and zoom effects, and select transition styles. (I'm not using the
"star wipe"). Add a music background and a voice narration
and presto; what could possibly go wrong? Yeah. Ask
me tomorrow. Elsewhere in life, it was a joy to see daughter Anne in her senior voice recital at UNL on Tuesday. I wonder if she'll blog some of her songs. They handed her a CD of the event practically as soon as it was over. The night before her recital, she conducted part of a concert at Norris High School as part of her student teaching effort. Alas, I missed that one, but heard excellent reports.
|
INDEX BLOGTHERS
ALSO ONLINE... A SHORT BIO
... CONTACT (I can't implement automatic comments because of the way my internet account is set up, but if you want to email me, I may post your email as a comment when I get around to it ...) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Presbyteer - Keith Ghormley - Lincoln Nebraska |