- ...Web
-
http://incolor.inetnebr.com/jepler/nails/index.html
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
- ...site
- http://www.infidels.org/
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
- ...Vishnu.
- In fact, in
Hindu mythology, there are several
incarnations of Vishnu, including Krishna
and Buddha.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
- ...10
- All page numbers refer to the Living Books
edition of More than a Carpenter.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
- ...(Bhagavad-Gita
- The
Bhagavad-Gita is one of the Buddhist holy books, and
apparently dates from about 400BC-I'm looking for a
good reference for the date. An online version exists
here
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
- ...widely.''
- Besides, if Jesus was the son
of god through Mary, why is the genealogy of some third person (Joseph,
the eventual husband of Mary) even an issue? Separately, the Savior
being descended from the line of David (Part of Jewish tradition and
prophecy) and the Savior being born of a virgin (Part of the pagan
traditions from which Christianity seems to have borrowed) may make a
certain amount of sense, but putting them together makes no sense.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
- ...death''
-
There are several historical passages commonly cited as giving this
supporting evidence. One is in the Antiquities of the Jews
18:63-64 by the Jewish historian Flavius Josephus. Another is in
Antiquities 20:9. According to the
Historicity of Jesus
FAQ,
these passages are of doubtful authenticity, and in any case
are not
eyewitness accounts of Christ, but secondhand accounts of ``a man
who was called Christ,'' or of his followers. It is
very probable that later Christian copyists have altered the texts,
because their tone is very different from what one would expect from
a non-Christian Jew. Finally, the passage postdates the alleged date
of Jesus' crucifixion by at least twenty years. Other sources
mentioned in the FAQ, as well as elsewhere in my own reading,
are all much later and thus even less worthy of the claim of
being an unbiased, contemporary source which supports the story of
Jesus' life.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
- ...drawn
- Fischer, David Hacket. Historians'
Fallacies: Toward a Logic of Historical Thought. New York:
Harper, 1970
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.