CHILDREN AT RISK
of
ABUSE AND NEGLECT
An update on the
status of children in
1992-2002

Presented by
The League of Women Voters of
CHILDREN AT RISK OF
ABUSE AND NEGLECT
An update on the
status of children in
1992-2002
TABLE OF CONTENTS
The
League of Women Voters & Children At Risk
......................... 1
Introduction
................................................................................ 2
The
Changing Face of Nebraska’s Children .................................. 3
Children
in Out-Of-Home Care .................................................... 6
The
Foster Care Review Board ..................................................... 10
Court
Appointed Special Advocates ............................................. 11
Acknowledgements
..................................................................... 12
TABLES
Ethnicity
of
Change
in Number of
Placement
of Children, 1990 and 2000 ....................................... 8
CHARTS
Number
& Cost of Children In Care by Placement Type,
1990-2000 ................................................................................ 10
This project is produced and funded by:
The
League of Women Voters of
The Apothecary,
(402) 475-1411
October, 2002
THE LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF
and
CHILDREN AT RISK
The
League of Women Voters is a nonpartisan political organization which encourages
the informed and active participation of citizens in government. The League
works to increase understanding of major public policy issues, and to influence
public policy through education and advocacy.
In
August of 1992, the League of Women Voters of Nebraska published a study, Children At Risk
of Abuse and Neglect: Services in Nebraska.
The purpose of the study was “to inform readers about the services
provided children and their families by governmental agencies charged with
protecting and providing care for children who have been abused and neglected.”
As
a result of that study, the League updated and strengthened its policy
regarding child welfare. Following are some of the major positions of the
League:
¨ Government
services for children should be comprehensive, accessible in all areas of the
state, integrated/coordinated, efficient and adequately funded and should
provide for accountability.
¨ All
reports of alleged abuse and neglect should be investigated.
¨ An
appropriate number of investigative workers should be hired...to ensure the
safety of children.
¨ Foster
families need...training, respite care, access to counseling, adequate
financial compensation...access to information about foster children...and
regular communication with Child Protective Service workers.
¨ A
range of placement options based on the needs of children should be developed
in all areas of the state.
¨ The
guardian ad litem system should be augmented with
volunteer Court Appointed Special Advocates.
¨ The
State Foster Care Review Board...should be continued.
¨ Family
Preservation Services...should be available to at-risk families in all areas of
the state.
CHILDREN AT RISK
1992-2002
Introduction
In
April, 2001, the Board of Directors of the League of Women Voters of Nebraska
approved a project to update the 1992 Children At Risk
study. The purpose of this update is to provide lawmakers, citizens, and
child-serving agencies with an objective examination of changes that have taken
place regarding the status of children in
It has been a
difficult task to attempt to compare services to children in
Out
of the complexity of the system and the sometimes questionable data, we have
attempted in this report to offer information to citizens and to public
officials which may prove useful when making policy decisions regarding the
welfare of

The majority of demographic data in
this report is a ten-year comparison from the 1990 census and the 2000 census.
Where other time periods are used, a notation is provided.
THE CHANGING FACE OF
1990 – 2000
In
order to provide adequate services for
Fewer Children,
Fewer Services?
Children
are becoming less of a presence in our state. While the overall growth of
From Blue Eyes to
Brown
The
face of
African American and
Native American children are maintaining stable percentages in the population,
of about 5 percent and 1 percent respectively.
Asian and Pacific Islander children have shown a small but steady
increase, and those children of “other” races are also on a steady rate of
increase.
By
far the largest increase in percentage of childhood ethnicity in
In raw numbers, the
largest decrease has been in the number of white children, particularly white
children age 5 and under. There were
24,343 fewer white children age 5 and under in
The
biggest increase in raw numbers of children in
Where are the
Children?

At the end of December in 1990, 4,832
Table
One
Ethnicity of
1990 Census 2000 Census
17-under 5-under 1-under
17-under 5-under 1-under
White 91% 91% 91% 85% 83% 78%
Black 5% 5% 5% 5% 6% 5%
Native 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
Asian/Pacific 1% 1% 1% 1% 2% 2%
Latino 3% 4% 4% 8% 11% 12%
Other Race 1% 2% 2% 4% 5%
5%
Table
2
Change in number of
17-under 5-under 1-under
Total + 21,230 (+5%) - 15,243 (-11%) + 635
(+1%)
White - 9,243
(-2%) - 24,343 (-18%) - 3,465 (-8%)
Black + 3,243 (+15%)
- 414 (-5%) +
15 (+.6%)
Native + 706 (+13%)
- 196 (-10%) +
48 (+8%)
Asian/Pacific + 1,998 (+50%)
+ 562 (+38%) +
303 (+68%)
Latino +
22,515 (+153%) + 8,386 (+153%) + 3,582 (+195%)
Other Race +
11,811 (+187%) + 4,281 (+181%) + 1,777 (+45%)
*Percentages in Table One do not add up to
100%, and raw numbers in Table Two do not compute to the exact total number of
children due to federal standards which permit multiple responses regarding
race.
CHILDREN IN OUT-OF-HOME CARE
From
1990 to 2000, there has been a 30% increase in the number of children in
out-of-home care, while there has been only a 5% increase in the number of
children in
In
1990, the estimated minimum monthly cost for children in foster care was
$2,637,671. By the year 2000, the estimated minimum monthly cost for children
in out-of-home care rose to $6,361,427.
The
amount of federal funding
In
1990, 32 percent of children who were out-of-home had four or more placements.
In 2000, over 48 percent of children in the system had four or more placements.
From
1990 to 2000, there has been no appreciable change in the ages of children in
out-of-home care. Approximately 30 percent of all children in out-of-home care
are age 16 or over. This is the largest age group of children in out-of-home
care, and this statistic has remained constant over the past 10 years. The next
largest age group in out-of-home care is elementary-school age children (6-12),
at almost 25 percent of all children in out-of-home care.
From
1990 to 2000, fewer white children as a percentage have been placed in
out-of-home care. About 11 percent fewer white children were placed out-of-home
in the year 2000 compared to the year 1990; while 1 percent more black children
have been placed out-of-home, about 2 percent more native children, and about 3
percent more Latino children have been placed in out-of-home care in the year
2000 compared to the year 1990.
Placement Trends
Between
1990 and 2000, there has been an increase of almost 90 percent in the number of
children placed in foster care. At the end of
1990, there were 1335 children in foster care.
At the end of 2000, there were 2507 children in foster care.
Far
fewer children were in permanent pre-adoptive placements in 2000 versus 1990.
In 1990, 564 children were in pre-adoptive placements. In 2000, only 212
children were in pre-adoptive homes.
More
children are missing. In 2000, the number of children listed as runaways or
“whereabouts unknown,” was 118, compared to only 40 in 1990.
The
most dramatic shift in out-of-home care has been in the utilization of group
homes. In 1990, 346 children were placed in group homes. By 2000, 1123 children were in group homes,
an increase of 225 percent.
In
1990, the three most costly placements were (1) Jails/Youth Development
Centers, (2) Residential Treatment Facilities, and (3) Foster Care. By 2000,
Group Homes became the most costly placement, followed by Jails/Youth
Development Centers, and Psychiatric Care.
For
a more complete assessment of the trends of children in out-of-home care, see
Table Three and the accompanying charts.

Table
Three
Placement of Children, 1990-2000
This table
represents the best effort to define where
The minimum
monthly cost of services is based on the least monthly stipend where a stipend
is used, and based on average local cost for similar service where a pre-set
stipend is not used.
Sources for
the data in this table include the Foster Care Review Board and the Nebraska
Department of Health and Human Services.
Number
& Cost of Children in Care by Placement Type
Placement Type # of Children %Change Min. Monthly Cost %Change
1990
2000 1990 2000
Runaway/Missing 40
118 + 195%
0 0 0%
Independent Living 45
62 + 38% $ 9,990 $ 21,824 + 118%
Adoptive Home, Not Final 497 189
- 62% 0
0 0%
Parent/Relative 751
884 + 17% $ 166,722 $ 196,248 +
17%
Foster/Adoptive Home 67
23 - 66% $ 14,874 $ 5,106 - 66%
Foster Home 1335
2507 + 88% $ 280,608 $ 555,222 +
98%
Job Corps/School/Other 371 121
- 67% $ 26,640 $
26,862 + .01%
Emergency Shelter 194
267 + 38% $ 87,300 $ 223,746 +156%
Group Home 346 1123
+225% $ 190,300 $1,932,683
+916%
Child Care Agency 136
9 - 93% $
85,000 $ 55,350
- 35%
Hospital 33 17
- 48% $
99,000 $ 178,500 +
80%
Residential Treatment 506
224 - 56% $ 316,250 $ 385,504 +
22%
Center for Dev.Disabled 19
49 +157% $ 5,225 $
117,600 +215%
Drug/Alcohol Treatment 35 1 - 97% $ 192,500 $ 7,500 -
96%
Psychiatric Treatment 40
109 +172% $
216,000 $ 817,500 +278%
Jail/YDC/Public Inst. 417 583
+ 40% $1,162,320 $1,836,450
+ 58%
THE FOSTER CARE REVIEW BOARD
1990-2000
The Foster Care
Review Board (FCRB) is an independent state agency not affiliated with the
Court or the Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services. The agency
consists of a nine-member State Board appointed by the Governor and approved by
the State Legislature that oversees the agency, an executive director, review
staff who facilitate local Foster Care Review Boards in communities across the
state, and support staff who manage the FCRB’s
tracking system, a database of children in out-of-home care. The State Board
meets approximately every other month, usually in
The
purpose of the Foster Care Review Board is to comply with federally-mandated
permanency and periodic review of children in out-of-home care. Local volunteer
Foster Care Review Boards meet monthly to review pertinent information on
children who are in the court system and placed out-of-home. The Review Board
collectively makes a determination as to whether a permanency plan is being
carried out, and whether the child is in an appropriate placement. The Board
provides a report of its determination to the judge and to parties involved in
the case.
In
1990, nine members served on the state’s Foster Care Review Board. In 2000, the number had increased to twelve.
In
1990, there were 26 local review boards, who reviewed 1,441 children’s cases,
representing about 32 percent of all children in out-of-home care. In 2000, 56
local review boards reviewed a total of 3,648 children, representing about 58
percent of all children in out-of-home care.
In 1990, 4,925 volunteer hours were
provided by state and local foster care review board members. The number of
volunteer hours increased to 29,027 by the year 2000.
Funding
for the 1990-91 fiscal year for the FCRB was $558,679. Funding for the
2000-2001 fiscal year was $1,388,206.
COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES
Court
Appointed Special Advocates (CASAs) are trained
volunteer citizens who are appointed by a juvenile court judge to provide an
independent investigation of a child’s case, visit with the child on a regular
basis, provide the judge with a written report, and monitor the child’s status.
Court Appointed Special Advocates take only one or two cases at a time so they
are able to devote more time and energy to advocating for the needs of the
child.
Local CASA programs
and the Nebraska CASA Association are not part of a state agency, and receive
no direct state funding. Local programs are funded by grants, private
donations, county governments, and
The
Children At Risk study of 1992 briefly mentioned the
role of the CASA in assuring quality services for children. In 1990, there were
only 3 CASA programs in all of
National
studies have proven that child abuse cases in which a CASA is involved are
resolved sooner, with fewer placements for the child and better outcomes for
the child and the child’s family. The
success of CASA programs and the endorsement of the programs by juvenile court
judges led to a marked increase in the number of CASA programs, volunteers, and
children served between 1990 and 2001.
By
2001, 21 CASA programs were in place in


ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The League of Women Voters of Nebraska wishes
to express gratitude to the following resources whose statistical data and
technical support enabled the League to produce this report:
Center for Public Affairs,
Nebraska Department of Health and Human
Services
A special thank you to the Social Policy
Committee of the League of Women Voters of Greater Omaha: Peggy Adair, Debbie
Starr, and Sarah Williams, for their many hours of research, information
gathering, design, and production of this document.